Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘kansas’

Entire United Nations Agenda 21 may be viewed here:  Agenda21

Agenda 21 – Chapter 25

CHILDREN AND YOUTH IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

25.1. Youth comprise nearly 30 per cent of the world’s population. The involvement of today’s youth in environment and development decision-making and in the implementation of programmes is critical to the long-term success of Agenda 21.

PROGRAMME AREAS

A. Advancing the role of youth and actively involving them in the protection of the environment and the promotion of economic and social development Basis for action

25.2. It is imperative that youth from all parts of the world participate actively in all relevant levels of decision-making processes because it affects their lives today and has implications for their futures. In addition to their intellectual contribution and their ability to mobilize support, they bring unique perspectives that need to be taken into account.

25.3. Numerous actions and recommendations within the international community have been proposed to ensure that youth are provided a secure and healthy future, including an environment of quality, improved standards of living and access to education and employment. These issues need to be addressed in development planning.

Objectives

25.4. Each country should, in consultation with its youth communities, establish a process to promote dialogue between the youth community and Government at all levels and to establish mechanisms that permit youth access to information and provide them with the opportunity to present their perspectives on government decisions, including the implementation of Agenda 21.

25.5. Each country, by the year 2000, should ensure that more than 50 per cent of its youth, gender balanced, are enrolled in or have access to appropriate secondary education or equivalent educational or vocational training programmes by increasing participation and access rates on an annual basis.

25.6. Each country should undertake initiatives aimed at reducing current levels of youth unemployment, particularly where they are disproportionately high in comparison to the overall unemployment rate.

25.7. Each country and the United Nations should support the promotion and creation of mechanisms to involve youth representation in all United Nations processes in order to influence those processes.

25.8. Each country should combat human rights abuses against young people, particularly young women and girls, and should consider providing all youth with legal protection, skills, opportunities and the support necessary for them to fulfil their personal, economic and social aspirations and potentials.

Activities

25.9. Governments, according to their strategies, should take measures to:

a. Establish procedures allowing for consultation and possible participation of youth of both genders, by 1993, in decision-making processes with regard to the environment, involving youth at the local, national and regional levels;

b. Promote dialogue with youth organizations regarding the drafting and evaluation of environment plans and programmes or questions on development;

c. Consider for incorporation into relevant policies the recommendations of international, regional and local youth conferences and other forums that offer youth perspectives on social and economic development and resource management;

d. Ensure access for all youth to all types of education, wherever appropriate, providing alternative learning structures, ensure that education reflects the economic and social needs of youth and incorporates the concepts of environmental awareness and sustainable development throughout the curricula; and expand vocational training, implementing innovative methods aimed at increasing practical skills, such as environmental scouting;

e. In cooperation with relevant ministries and organizations, including representatives of youth, develop and implement strategies for creating alternative employment opportunities and provide required training to young men and women;

f. Establish task forces that include youth and youth non-governmental organizations to develop educational and awareness programmes specifically targeted to the youth population on critical issues pertaining to youth. These task forces should use formal and non-formal educational methods to reach a maximum audience. National and local media, non-governmental organizations, businesses and other organizations should assist in these task forces;

g. Give support to programmes, projects, networks, national organizations and youth nongovernmental organizations to examine the integration of programmes in relation to their project requirements, encouraging the involvement of youth in project identification, design, implementation and follow-up;

h. Include youth representatives in their delegations to international meetings, in accordance with the relevant General Assembly resolutions adopted in 1968, 1977, 1985 and 1989.

25.10. The United Nations and international organizations with youth programmes should take measures to:

a. Review their youth programmes and consider how coordination between them can be enhanced;

b. Improve the dissemination of relevant information to governments, youth organizations and other non-governmental organizations on current youth positions and activities, and monitor and evaluate the application of Agenda 21;

c. Promote the United Nations Trust Fund for the International Youth Year and collaborate with youth representatives in the administration of it, focusing particularly on the needs of youth from developing countries.

Means of implementation

Financing and cost evaluation

25.11. The Conference secretariat has estimated the average total annual cost (1993-2000) of implementing the activities of this programme to be about $1.5 million on grant or concessional terms. These are indicative and order-of-magnitude estimates only and have not been reviewed by Governments. Actual costs and financial terms, including any that are non-concessional, will depend upon, inter alia, the specific strategies and programmes Governments decide upon for implementation.

B. Children in sustainable development Basis for action

25.12. Children not only will inherit the responsibility of looking after the Earth, but in many developing countries they comprise nearly half the population. Furthermore, children in both developing and industrialized countries are highly vulnerable to the effects of environmental degradation. They are also highly aware supporters of environmental thinking. The specific interests of children need to be taken fully into account in the participatory process on environment and development in order to safeguard the future sustainability of any actions taken to improve the environment.

Objectives

25.13. National governments, according to their policies, should take measures to:

a. Ensure the survival, protection and development of children, in accordance with the goals endorsed by the 1990 World Summit for Children (A/45/625, annex);

b. Ensure that the interests of children are taken fully into account in the participatory process for sustainable development and environmental improvement.

Activities

25.14. Governments should take active steps to:

a. Implement programmes for children designed to reach the child-related goals of the 1990s in the areas of environment and development, especially health, nutrition, education, literacy and poverty alleviation;

b. Ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child (General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989, annex), at the earliest moment and implement it by addressing the basic needs of youth and children;

c. Promote primary environmental care activities that address the basic needs of communities, improve the environment for children at the household and community level and encourage the participation and empowerment of local populations, including women, youth, children and indigenous people, towards the objective of integrated community management of resources, especially in developing countries;

d. Expand educational opportunities for children and youth, including education for environmental and developmental responsibility, with overriding attention to the education of the girl child;

e. Mobilize communities through schools and local health centres so that children and their parents become effective focal points for sensitization of communities to environmental issues;

f. Establish procedures to incorporate children’s concerns into all relevant policies and strategies for environment and development at the local, regional and national levels, including those concerning allocation of and entitlement to natural resources, housing and recreation needs, and control of pollution and toxicity in both rural and urban areas.

25-15. International and regional organizations should cooperate and coordinate in the proposed areas. UNICEF should maintain cooperation and collaboration with other organizations of the United Nations, Governments and non-governmental organizations to develop programmes for children and programmes to mobilize children in the activities outlined above.

Means of implementation

(a) Financing and cost evaluation

25.16. Financing requirements for most of the activities are included in estimates for other programmes.

(b) Human resource development and capacity-building

25.17. The activities should facilitate capacity-building and training activities already contained in other chapters of Agenda 21.

Entire United Nations Agenda 21 may be viewed here:  Agenda21

Read Full Post »

Basis of the previous posting.  The presenter sourced information from the book he authored.

http://www.tatepublishing.com/bookstore/book.php?w=978-1-61346-408-3

Hedke - The Audacity of Freedom-Final.indd

The Audacity of Freedom by Dennis Hedke

Natural-born U.S. citizen, geophysicist, member of the Kansas House of Representatives, husband, father, veteran, and unapologetic supporter of the U.S. Constitution, author Dennis Hedke mounts an unequivocal challenge to the Socialist-Marxist-Communist principles being pushed upon freedom loving Americans by entities and individuals both within and outside the United States.

Recognizing the incredible encroachment on multiple tracks against the principles espoused by our Founding Fathers, the author provides factual content relating to our already relinquished freedoms, and significant insight as to where to apply pressure to restore those recoverable losses.

Parties most influential in and around the Obama Administration, foreign policy, energy policy, environmental and fiscal policy issues are examined, with substantive recommendations toward the enhancement of the America of the future.

With Foreword by Kansas Speaker of the House, Representative Mike O’Neal

Individuals questioning the ‘green movement’ or Israel’s place in current political and spiritual discussion will find a wealth of answers in The Audacity of Freedom. Dennis Hedke’s straightforward and unapologetic plunge into this debate offers the best of science and periodic Biblical underpinning in leading readers to logical and eye-opening conclusions.

David E. Welsh

Senior Pastor

Central Christian

Wichita, KS

Hedke defends the very basis upon which these United States were founded against those who would seek to control a free people through fundamental and fashionable change. He simply educates with an intellectual honesty so often lacking in those purportedly acting for the benefit of Americans.

Dr. Donald Vasquez ER Surgeon

Wichita, KS

268 pages – $19.99 (paperback)

This book is also available for purchase as an eBook download.

Welcome to the world of eBooks where instead of receiving a physical paper book in the mail, you will receive access to the eBook file for this complete book. Within minutes you can be reading this book on your computer, PDA, cellphone or a stand-alone eBook reader—at a reduced cost! Unless otherwise noted, all eBooks are in the PDF format which is compatible with most eBook readers including Sony Reader, Nook, Kindle 2, iPad, and iPhone 4. Click the “Order Online” button below to purchase this eBook download today!

$13.99 (digital download)

view trailer

visit website

Share this title with your friends:

All files © 2004-2013 Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC. Tate Publishing and its logo are trademarked by Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC. No portion of this page may be duplicated, copied, or used in any manner without expressed written consent of Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC under penalty of law.

Read Full Post »

Recently during March 28, 2013 discussion on Agenda Item #7 http://lims.jocogov.org/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=1562&doctype=SUMMARY we were a little disappointed that no one asked or revealed the source of the Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) that justified the conversion of a few County vehicles and fueling stations to CNG.

To be perfectly clear, CNG burns more efficiently than gasoline.  The ratio of energy consumed to energy produced is nearly perfect.  The historical problem has been distribution, we are a liquid/low pressure consumer.  The same infrastructure issues apply to the ideal energy source HYDROGEN.

At the conclusion of this discussion Chairman Eilert realized and expanded in words that his job is to manage the County’s tax dollars, green as they may be.  “We will purchase the cheapest fuel.”

Just two weeks later, this is the Johnson County United Nations Agenda 21 position:

Earth Day Proclamation

Suddenly with his signature CNG is a MORAL obligation, an ETHICAL conflict and souly HYPOCRATIC.  (Or an ETHICAL obligation, MORAL conflict and soly HYPROCRATIC.)  Save your energy on that question.

“Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Anyone Who Threatens It”
Ken Dunwoody                               GOD
Henpecked Acres                                  One Nation
14850 W. 159th St.
Olathe, Ks. 66062
(913)768-1603
kdunwoody2@aol.com

Read Full Post »

The Johnson County Board of County Commissioners were scheduled to vote February 21, 2013 on substantial funding to replace a roof on a building destined “National Museum of Suburbia“.  The purchase of and funding for these repairs were approved by the previous Commission in 2011.  With one existing Commissioner consistently voting “NO” and with two newly elected Commissioners which ran through the election process opposed to this boondoggle, the anticipated vote was 4 in favor 3 opposed.

The evening of February 20, 2013 local media broadcasts non stop on area severe Winter weather conditions, road closures, warnings “stay at home” and school districts through the region announced closure.  In what should have been a victory speech for Global Warming “our efforts to reduce greenhouse gas were witnessed today by declaring County business as usual closed due to inclement weather and significant snow accumulation.”

In what should have been a high tide moment on Global Warming, we observed a “pier review” during low tide.  Chair Eilert tip-toed and danced his way to avoid a two-two vote blocking this funding.

Just 4 days later, a similar but just slightly less severe storm threatens the area.  With school districts closed and no scheduled Commission Meeting for tomorrow, this was displayed on the County site before 3:45 PM today.

2.26.13

Admittedly I have to take some responsibility for this.  Two years ago Chair Eilert eliminated written transcripts for all official Commission Meetings.  When presenting to the Commission on Global Warming I have often referred to “peer review” science.  I never believed he would wait to see who showed up as “pier review”.

All joking aside, it appears that County employees showed up for work just so tu-tu Eilert would allow them to go home following a non-vote cooling event.  These same “Need to work forty hours a week, left their kids at home and risked their lives to go to watch a ballerina folks”.  For all the graduates of “Speech Crafters” and “Toast Masters” that were taught to think of your audience as being naked……….. Think Eilert in a tu-tu.

Looking forward to February 28, 2013.

“Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Anyone Who Threatens It”

Ken Dunwoody                                      
GOD
Henpecked Acres                                         One Nation
14850 W. 159th St. Olathe, Ks. 66062
(913)768-1603
kdunwoody2@aol.com

Read Full Post »

Left blames Chicago’s out-of-control gun violence on global warming

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/01/31/left-blames-chicagos-out-of-control-gun-violence-on-global-warming-17722

January 31, 2013  by

Hefner on Morning JoeIn all the talk about gun control, Chicago presents a significant problem for the left. With some of the toughest gun laws in the nation, including bans on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, gun-related deaths in Chicago were higher than troop deaths in Afghanistan in 2012, according to The Daily.

Complicating things even further, Chicago is where President Obama calls home, where he once worked as a community organizer, where his former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, now serves as mayor – and where The Daily reports the murder rate is up a staggering 35 percent in hizzoner’s second year in office, quadruple the rate of New York City.

Gun shops are outlawed, and there are no civilian gun ranges within city limits. Yet the more the plans fail, the more the planners plan. Emanuel says he is “working on an ordinance that would restrict guns more tightly,” WLS-TV Chicago reported earlier this month.

The Windy City provides stark evidence that tougher gun restrictions fail to make us safer, and the left must find a way to explain this away.

Enter Christie Hefner, the former chairwoman and CEO of Playboy Enterprises who is now working with the far-left organization, Center for American Progress. (NOlathe NOte:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_American_Progress  “Major individual donors include George Soros, Peter Lewis, Steve Bing, and Herb and Marion Sandler.”)

On Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Hefner said Chicago’s sky-high murder rate could be blamed — at least in part — on climate change, according to the Daily Caller.

Talk about killing two birds with one stone (pardon the pun).

“Yes, last year we hit a record number of murders from guns [in Chicago],” Hefner said. “And this year we are already outpacing last year’s numbers. Now, there are contributing factors that are not under anybody’s control and may seem odd, but it is factually true. One of them is actually the weather. There is a dramatic increase in gun violence when it is warmer. And we are having this climate change effect that is driving that.”

Which begs the question: Is it just hotter in Chicago?

The most recent FBI statistics show that overall, violent crime was down in 2011 across America. What’s more, the Midwest, which includes Chicago, had the country’s lowest violent crime rate, with 349.9 reported cases per 100,000 residents.

In a forward-looking October article that focused on gun violence in Chicago and Obama’s position on gun control, Breitbart.com closed with this ominous warning: “Just think, this means that if Obama wins a second term the whole country will get a chance to enjoy the same kind of peace and tranquility Chicagoans enjoy on their gun-free streets everyday.”

Past, meet the future.

Watch yourself, here’s the video……

RELATED

Leaked UN report confirms global warming a net benefit to mankind

Biden tells tree huggers’ ‘keep the faith,’ we’re helping you next

Kerry to make global warming priority as secretary of state

Read Full Post »

Ken,
You may share/post this and anything else I write. My sole motivation in writing is to educate and motivate any who may be uninformed. Therefore, my view is the wider the dissemination the better.  
Take care.
Dave
—– Original Message —–
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: MUST View! No , really this is a MUST View.
Dave,
This is the article that I referred to several days ago.  This is extremely well written and certainly one of the best I have ever read.  Good job my friend.  May I post and share with others?
Ken
In a message dated 11/22/2012 10:43:10 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, promiseforyou@sbcglobal.net writes:
The conundrum we face today, and have faced thoughout the history of the United States, is that the freedoms gauranteed by the Constitution allow for people to choose to support socialism or communism as their form of government if they so desire. It allows for the Constitution to be ignored because it is based on a set of ideals rooted in moral values. Once the ideals are abandoned, or no longer taught, there are no limits to what the government can do. The majority of voting citizens in 2008 and 2012 accept this fact and are willing to give up freedom for security.
Compounding the situation is that many young people today do not know history and therefore do not understand why the Constitution is necessary to define the limits of government, the rule of law, and individual freedom in order to preserve our Republic. For them, the founding principles have become irrevelant to the present-day function of government.
In addition, for years we have fostered a me-first entitlement attitude that works in lock-step with an ever expanding goverment to replace the free market system with a socialist/communist system. More government control, less individual freedom! It is a “give me mine” and “the hell with everyone” attitude that has undermined moral and religious principles of right and wrong, equality, fairness, and individual responsibility. Dependency has become acceptable. At this point in our history, dependency is clearly the victor.
Those of us who “still hold these truths to be self evident” are in the minority. We are losing battle after battle and, although, the war is not over, the question remains will we be able to marshal enough forces to launch a campaign to restore the founding principles? Will we be equal to the task? Are we willing to become confrontational and engage is hand-to-hand combat?
Personally, my efforts to sound the alarm within my own family have failed. I have alienated my brother and my daughter. My brother is a “me-first” guy who does not want to be bothered as long as he can continue to accumulate personal wealth. My daughter is comfortable with the advance of socialist ideas and sees them as no threat to her way of life. I am the wacko relative with the tin foil hat on! Therefore, my personal experience says we are not going to win the war.
Having said all of that, I still support the Constitutional right of freedom of choice verses any other system! Unfortunately it will bring about our demise.
Dave Losey

Read Full Post »

This has been the traditional image of ICLEI and Agenda 21

6

9

Through out this United Nations document (Agenda 21) leading towards a global government, there are three reoccurring themes: 1) Redistribution of wealth. 2) Government control of lands, individual property rights must be relinquished. 3) Government control of water and access to water.

Mapped, the United States was designed by the United Nations to look like this

wildlandsmap22611BigGovernment

Early in his first term President Obama created both the means and methods to remove property rights and increase government (local, regional and federal) control of both property and water.  This ingenious method creates a sense of civil responsibility and voluntary surrender of rights of property. 

http://nolathe.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/ago50statereport.pdf

AGO-1 AGO-2 AGO-3

Soon after ICLEI and Agenda 21 released a new imageCircles_of_Sustainability_image_%28assessment_-_Melbourne_2011%29

As with both of the Kansas choices, most approved projects involve irrevocable conservation easements of private property and/or water/river access.  Here is a portion of the Kansas launch for one project May 2011:  (NOTE: background posting)

And a NOlathe article from January 2012 http://nolathe.net/2012/01/24/kansas-republican-governor-brownback-shifts-support-from-perry-to-obama/  Our modern day Lewis and Clark in Kansas (Gov. Brownback and Lt. Gov. Colyer) are Republicans.  The Kansas Republican Party and the National Republican delegates passed unanimously resolutions to block Agenda 21 activities by duly elected Republicans.  With great pride we can say this was initiated in Kansas. 

So in early 2013 our modern day Lewis and Clark continue to expand the global domain with Obama bucks complete with “Visions” and “regionalism” served up by paid “facilitators”.  In todays “vision” world, “falicitators” are trained to bring consensus to a predetermined “regional” conclusion. (NOTE: The below press release is riddled with Agenda 21 terms.)

Kansas Agenda 21

Flint Hills Symposium

On January 11, 2013 our Lewis and Clark duo will introduce http://www.publicsquarecommunities.com/index.php  as the paid “facilitator”.

Looking at the near-by community of Ft. Scott (another Public Square Community client) do not be shocked at the amount of land and water coming under control of the government as a result of additional local tax hikes. http://www.publicsquarecommunities.com/community/ftscott/news.htm 

So here we are, nation-wide or at least specifically here in Kansas, elected State Governments defying their party platform and pursuing a global agenda paid for by Obama’s bucks and future local taxation while eliminating property rights.  I want to click my heels three times and go home.

Governor Brownback  http://www.governor.ks.gov/

Lt. Governor Colyer  https://governor.ks.gov/about-the-office/lt-govenor-jeff-colyer

State Senator Jeff Longbine  Jeff.Longbine@senate.ks.gov

 
 
“Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Anyone Who Threatens It”

Ken Dunwoody                                      
GOD
Henpecked Acres                                     
One Nation
14850 W. 159th St.
Olathe, Ks. 66062
(913)768-1603
kdunwoody2@aol.com http://NOlathe.net http://NOjocoboco.net
View Sarah’s Story http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUWuUvOZ7RY http://vimeo.com/23038312

.

Read Full Post »

USArmy-InternmentResettlement

USArmy-InternmentResettlement

Summary of this 326 page document http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/05/17/did_you_hear_the_one_about_us_internment_camps?page=0,0

Did You Hear the One about U.S. Internment Camps?

A leaked Army document on mass detentions has extremists boiling over on both the right and the left.

BY J.M. BERGER | MAY 17, 2012

As soon as you see the title, you know you’re in trouble — “Army Field Manual 3-39.40: Internment and Resettlement Operation”

When you click on the link, as thousands already have, you get a 326-page PDF describing how the U.S. military would go about imprisoning and relocating massive populations — it’s a best-practice document for rounding up thousands of militants in a foreign country or in the event of a massive terrorist attack or natural disaster on U.S. soil.

Wait, what was that last part?

A handful of references to domestic applications — the prospective internment and resettlement of U.S. citizens — have fueled the spread of FM 3-39.40 like wildfire through the world of online political dissent, where it is being discussed by everyone from the Patriot movement on the right to Occupy on the left to Anonymous, anarchists, organized racists, survivalists, and plain old conspiracy theorists in between.

The document responsible for this perfect storm of radical chatter appears to have first leaked on the website PublicIntelligence.net, which is similar to WikiLeaks but has until now maintained a lower profile. From there, it was picked up by the conspiracy-oriented news site Prison Planet, and after that there was no stopping it.

FM 3-39.40 is an Army operations guide dated February 2010 with headings that include “Capture, Detention, and Initial Screening,” “Detainee Flow,” “Theater Internment Facility,” “Strategic Internment Facility,” “Detainee Rehabilitation Programs,” and much, much more.

The manual has been around in one form or another since 1978, when it was first written to assimilate lessons learned from the resettlement of tens of thousands of Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees to the United States after the Vietnam War. It has been substantially rewritten since then, most recently to include scenarios encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan.

FM 3-39.40 is, essentially, a how-to guide for taking control of thousands or tens of thousands of people in a specific area, sorting them out afterward, and controlling them while in detention or in the midst of a resettlement.

For domestic extremists and radicals in search of evidence to support their forgone conclusion that the government is on the verge of declaring a police state, the field manual is a rhetorical gold mine — even if it didn’t specifically discuss how to apply these techniques to American citizens on U.S. soil.

Unfortunately, FM 3-39.40 discusses exactly that. Here are a few choice excerpts:

SUPPORT TO CIVIL SUPPORT OPERATIONS

2-39. Civil support is the DOD support to U.S. civil authorities for domestic emergencies, and for designated law enforcement and other activities. (JP 3-28) Civil support includes operations that address the consequences of natural or man-made disasters, accidents, terrorist attacks, and incidents in the U.S. and its territories.

2-40. The I/R [internment/resettlement] tasks performed in support of civil support operations are similar to those during combat operations, but the techniques and procedures are modified based on the special [operating environment]associated with operating within U.S. territory and according to the categories of individuals (primarily DCs [dislocated civilians]) to be housed in I/R [internment/resettlement]facilities. [...]

STRATEGIC REPORTING

10-33. Military police will typically be required to account for DCs and report to higher headquarters. This may require the issuance of ISNs [internment serial numbers] or control numbers that are specific to DCs. Commanders conducting resettlement operations ensure a proper understanding of the ISN issuance policy before assigning an ISN to a DC. Even in civil support operations where social security numbers may be used, a supporting system will be required for those without social security numbers. [...]

The field manual also broadly discusses a variety of psychological operations for use in managing detainees, including identifying “malcontents, trained agitators, and political leaders” in detainee communities in order “to reduce or remove antagonistic attitudes.”

Passages like these reflect lessons learned from the operation of internment facilities in Iraq, where psychological operations officers performed an intelligence function in managing camps that held as many as tens of thousands of detainees at their peak.

At the beginning of the Iraq war and even through the 2008 surge, there were few guidelines and regulations to help soldiers conduct these massive detention operations, according to a former military officer who conducted detainee operations in internment facilities in Iraq.

“I would have loved to have this [field manual] five years ago,” he said. The vast majority of guidance in the manual is intended for use in foreign theaters, he said, noting that only a handful of paragraphs from the 326-page manual address domestic operations of any kind.

An Army spokesman, speaking on background, said the current spate of online postings had taken passages from the manual significantly out of context, conflating wartime operational guidance (such as psychological operations) with peacetime operations in which a limited number of the manual’s principals would be applied on U.S. soil, in exceptional cases such as during relief efforts after Hurricane Katrina.

Not that the folks most outraged by this document see the handling of Katrina relief as benign. FM 3-39.40 lands during a time of skyrocketing paranoia and grievance among domestic radicals of virtually every stripe, in many cases fueled by their interpretations of real government actions, from the use of informants and undercover operations against would-be terrorists to the Patriot Act to the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act and its provisions for the military detention of American citizens.

Some of their talking points have even spilled over into mainstream politics, as in the case of the Kansas state legislature’s condemnation of the U.N.’s Agenda 21 sustainable energy initiative, which many radicals see as undermining U.S. sovereignty.

Because of its content and authenticity, FM 3-39.40 has a bit more tooth than some of its predecessors in conspiracyland. Within two weeks of its first appearance online, the document has produced more than 237,000 hits on Google.

Radicalization is driven in large part by victimization narratives, whether it’s a fear of Big Brother watching, big banks looting, big government seizing one’s guns, or a big, global war on Islam. A document like FM 3-39.40 is read as confirming the worst fears of an unusually wide spectrum of political dissenters, radicals, and would-be violent extremists from the right, left, and “other. ” Gasoline, meet match.

Read Full Post »

Our ‘pig in a poke’ King Louie purchase has several tentacles, more like an octopus.  Reviewing the definition of “tentacle” reveals an appendage used for feeding of a spineless organism.  Yep, that about describes our County Commissioners.

We have already shown the guise justification in purchasing the building is nothing short of eliminating the very thing they wish to make a museum of, suburbia.  The planning document 2011InterpretiveMasterPlan details precisely how the suburbs of Johnson County are no longer needed or deserved when compared to the need of consolidating populations back to the inner cities.  The Obama administration United Nations has determined that “sprawl” is not sustainable and that wealth must be redistributed.  This posting takes a look at who funded the commissars’ new plan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Museum_and_Library_Services

The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) is an independent agency of the United States federal government established in 1996. It is the main source of federal support for libraries and museums within the United States, having the mission to “create strong libraries and museums that connect people with information and ideas.” IMLS ”works at the national level and in coordination with state and local organizations to sustain heritage, culture, and knowledge; enhance learning and innovation; and support professional development.” In fiscal year 2007, IMLS had a budget of $247 million.

——

We know their precious document used to purchase an asbestos laden building and committing as much as $40,000,000 in the near future was written by an United Nations Obama agency.  Now what are the odds?  http://www.imls.gov/ 

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers